PENGARUH TEORI MOTIVASI DUA FAKTOR TERHADAP KEPUASAN KERJA KARYAWAN
Abstract
Job satisfaction is an element that is recognized as very important for a company or organization. Someone wants to work because of the emergence of an impulse from within him to get better expectations than before and certainly more satisfying. Frederick Herzberg states that a person when doing his job is influenced by two dominant factors including the Hygiene Factor and the Motivation Factor. Hygiene Factors are maintenance factors related to human nature so that bodily peace is obtained. Motivation Factors are factors related to individual psychological needs such as feeling perfect in doing work. The research method used is judgment sampling by collecting data through questionnaires distributed to 141 respondents who work at the Perkumpulan Strada school, North East Jakarta branch. The measuring instrument in this research is validity test, reliability test, percentage, average, Likert scale, structural equation model. Based on the results of the research, the analysis of the structural equation model shows that there is a significant positive influence of motivator factors on employee job satisfaction. There is a significant positive effect of hygiene factor on employee job satisfaction. There is a positive and significant relationship between motivator factors and hygiene factors.
References
[2] C. F., & Abd. (2003). , Studi tentang Metode Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Upaya Pengembangan Diri di Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Ampel Surabaya Periode 2000-2002. Fakultas Tarbiyah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
[3] Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
[4] Hasan, S., & Ranupandojo, H. (2000). Teori dan Konsep Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
[5] Junaidi. (2021). APLIKASI AMOS DAN STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL (SEM). Makassar: unhaspress.
[6] Kadarisman, M. (2012). Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
[7] Malayu. (2006). Manajemen Dasar, Pengertian, dan Masalah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
[8] Mangkunegara, A. P. (2007). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: PT REMAJA ROSDAKARYA BANDUNG.
[9] Mulianto, S. (2006). Panduan Lengkap Supervisi diperkaya Perspektif Syariah: Menuju Supervisi yang Profesional, beretos kerja tinggi, dan amanah. Jakarta: Gramedia.
[10] Nitisemito, A. (1992). Manajemen Personalia. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia .
[11] Rahmanto, J. (1990). Psikologi Organisasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
[12] Ramadhayanti, A. (2019). Aplikasi SPSS untuk Penelitian dan Riset Pasar. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo .
[13] Reksohadiprodjo, S., & Handoko, H. (2001). Organisasi Perusahaan: Teori, Struktur dan Perilaku. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
[14] Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2014). Perilaku Organisasi . Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
[15] Suharto, E. (2008). Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta Bandung.
[16] Suprianto, Masniadi, R., & Hartono, Y. (2020). HYGIENE FACTOR dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan . Sleman: deepublish.
[17] Vemmylia. (2009). Pengaruh Hubungan Interpersonal dan Lingkungan Kerja. Medan: Skripsi Universitas Sumatera Utara.
[18] Wexley, & Yulk. (2005). Perilaku Organisasi dan Psikologi Personalia. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
[19] Widarjono, A. (2015). Analisis Multivariat Terapan dengan Program SPSS, AMOS dan SMARTPLS. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.
[20] Yount, W. (1999). Research Design and Statical Analysis in Christian Ministry. Fort Worth: Southwestern Baptis Theological Seminary
