DISPARITY ON CUMMULATION CASES OF TORT AND BREACH OF CONTRACT
Abstract
The discussion on the differentiation between breach of contract and tort has been prevail in a long time. In addition, there is judge’s disparity on the breach of contract and tort cumulation cases. Three cumulation dicisions were anallysed to understand the legal reasoning of the judges. Legal as well as conceptual approach used to reveal the strong relationship between breach of contract and tort in actual cases. Despite the different nature of the cases, the principle of tort existed on the breach of contract. However, the disparities of the awards occured on the actual cases. Firstly, judge consider that the cumulation is formally invalid hence the claim is unacceptable. Finally, on others cases the former reason is put aside and the judges acknowledge the strong relation between breach of contract and tort. Furthermore, systematical legal reasoning is used to grant the claims. With regard to the fairness, judge as the law enforcer need to give reasonable decision with their intellectuality.
References
[2] Apeldoorn V. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (Inleiding Tot De Studie Van Het Nederlandse Recht). Jakarta: Noordhoff-Kolf N.V; 1954.
[3] Soeroso. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2011.
[4] Sutjipto R. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti; 2000.
[5] Subekti. Hukum Perjanjian, cetakan 19. Jakarta: Intermasa. 2001;
[6] Sudjana. Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi Dan Tanggung Jawab Para Pihak Dalam Transaksi Anjak Piutang. Verit Justitia. 2019;5(2):374–98.
[7] Shidarta. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Lingkungan: Penafsiran Ekstensif Dan Doktrin Injuria Sine Damno. Yudisial. 2010;III(01):60–77.
[8] Seiff F. Indikasi Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Persaingan Usaha Pada Jasa Rapid Test Covid-19 Di Rumah Sakit. Jurist-Diction. 2021;4(3):997–1022.
[9] Paparang F. Pembelaan Terhadap Tuduhan Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Menurut Kuh Perdata. J Ilmu Huk [Internet]. 2016;III(10):31–45. Available from: http://repo.unsrat.ac.id/1239/1/PEMBELAAN_TERHADAP_TUDUHAN_MELAKUKAN_PERBUATAN_MELAWAN_HUKUM_MENURUT_.pdf
[10] Isaacs N. Fault and Liability. Harv Law Rev [Internet]. 1918;31(7):954–79. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1327813
[11] Djojodirdjo M. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta; 1979.
[12] Rizky F, Syahrizal. Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan Sanksinya. J Justisia. 2018;3(2):239–55.
[13] Hassanah H. Analisis Hukum Tentang Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Transaksi Bisnis Secara Online (E-Commerce) Berdasarkan Burgerlijke Wetboek Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. J Wawasan Yuridika. 2016;32(1):38.
[14] Sumarajaya IMA, Sarjana IM. Tanggung Jawab Kontraktor Terhadap Kerugian yang Dialami oleh Pemilik Rumah Tinggal Pada Warna Wirawan Construction. Kertha Desa. 2020;8(7):1–12.
[15] Yudho WA. Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Sebagai Sumber Utang Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Madura Rechtidee, Fak Huk Univ Trunojoyo Madura. 2017;12(2).
[16] Parmitasari I. Hubungan Hukum Antara Pemilik Kendaraan dengan Pengelola Parkir. J Yuridis. 2017;3(1):20–37.
[17] Sudikno M. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta Lib. 2006;
[18] Nur Iftitah Isnantiana. Legal Reasoning Hakim dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara di Pengadilan. Islamadina. 2017;18(2):53.
[19] Marbun AN. Pembuatan Putusan. Available from: http://mappifhui.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Pembuatan-Putusan.pdf
[20] Weruin UU. Logika, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum. J Konstitusi. 2017;14(2):374.
[21] Simanjuntak E. Peran Yurisprudensi dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia The Roles of Case Law in Indonesian Legal System. 2018;16.
[22] Fitria R. Memahami hermeneutika dalam mengkaji teks. Syi’ar. 2016;16(2):33–42.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
