PENDAMPINGAN MICROTEACHING COMPUTATIONAL THINKING PADA KELOMPOK GURU MTS AL YAKIN SEBAGAI BEST PRACTICE PROSES LITERASI DIGITAL DI SEKOLAH

Ita Aristia Sa’ida; Nirma Ceisa Santi; Hastie Audytra; Guruh Putro Dirgantoro; Devi Ayu Wulandari

doi:10.47492/eamal.v4i3.3552

Ita Aristia Sa’ida Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri
Nirma Ceisa Santi Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri
Hastie Audytra Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri
Guruh Putro Dirgantoro Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri
Devi Ayu Wulandari Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sunan Giri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47492/eamal.v4i3.3552

Keywords: Computational Thinking, Microteaching, Best Practice, Literasi Digital

Abstract

Lack of Computational Thinking in schools can cause problems including lack of problem-solving skills, limited creativity, lack of abstract thinking skills, inability to manage and analyze data, lack of understanding of the implications of technology, and lagging behind in career preparation. Therefore, it is important to strengthen the teaching of Computational Thinking in schools so that students have the skills and understanding needed to face challenges in the digital era. To overcome the problem of lack of Computational Thinking in schools, it is important to improve adequate curriculum, provide training and support to teachers, provide sufficient resources and access to technology, raise awareness of the importance of Computational Thinking, and encourage integration with other subjects. Socialization of Computational Thinking in schools can help prepare students to face an increasingly digital and complex world and can help overcome several problems related to technological developments and competency needs in the digital era. Through the socialization of Computational Thinking, problems such as lack of computational thinking skills, inability to solve complex problems, lack of understanding of the impact of technology, lack of integration of technology in learning, and less than optimal preparation for the digital workplace can be overcome. Thus, students can be better prepared to face challenges and take advantage of opportunities in the ever-evolving digital era

References

[1] Tikva C, Tambouris E. Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education: A conceptual model based on a systematic literature Review. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2021;162:104083. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104083
[2] Angeli C, Giannakos M. Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Comput Human Behav [Internet]. 2020;105:106185. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185
[3] Zhang LC, Nouri J. A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2019;141(June):103607. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
[4] Angeli C, Valanides N. Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Comput Human Behav [Internet]. 2020;105(January):105954. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018
[5] Lyon JA, J. Magana A. Computational thinking in higher education: A review of the literature. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2020;28(5):1174–89.
[6] Li Y, Schoenfeld AH, diSessa AA, Graesser AC, Benson LC, English LD, et al. Computational Thinking Is More about Thinking than Computing. J STEM Educ Res. 2020;3(1):1–18.
[7] Li Y, Schoenfeld AH, diSessa AA, Graesser AC, Benson LC, English LD, et al. On Computational Thinking and STEM Education. J STEM Educ Res. 2020;3(2):147–66.
[8] Labusch A, Eickelmann B, Vennemann M. Computational Thinking Processes and Their Congruence with Problem-Solving and Information Processing. Computational Thinking Education. 2019. 65–78 p.
[9] Esteve-Mon FM, Llopis MA, Adell-Segura J. Digital competence and computational thinking of student teachers. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;15(2):29–41.